Uronic acid degradation is a method to establish connectivities to a uronic acid. If the experiment succeeds you should at least obtain information of the residue that the uronic acid is linked to (i.e. the residue to the right). In fortunate cases one or sometimes two residues that are linked to the uronic acid can be deduced. The experiment always starts with permethylation of the polysaccharide and it is of importance that the carboxy group is methylated and that it is kept as the methyl ester. The permethylated polysaccharide is then treated with base, either dimsyl sodium in DMSO or sodium alkoxide in alcohol. H-5 is then abstracted and the 4-O-substituent eliminated (1). Elimination of the O-3 substituent from the liberated sugar is an analogous b-elimination which is called pealing (2). Sometimes isolation, purification and mild acid hydrolysis of the product is performed but mostly not. Then, methyl iodide or trideuteriomethyl iodide is added and the liberated sugars labelled.
Normally the experiment is run with three resulting samples, one part is withdrawn after the first methylation, another after the base treatment, and a third after the remethylation. All samples should be run according to step 8-14, i.e. hydrolysed, reduced and acetylated. Only shortage of material is a good excuse for not doing all three.
The fictive case above gives a methylation analysis with 2,4,6-Me3-Glc and 2,3,6-Me3-Glc. A hydrolysate after the base treatment gives only some 2,4,6-Me3-Glc and the remethylation product gives 2,4,6-Me3-3-CD3-Glc only. Thus, it can be concluded, after the base treatment, that a 4-substituted Glc is linked to the uronic acid, because the disappearance of 2,3,6-Me3-Glc. After the last analysis, i.e. the remethylation it can be concluded that the uronic acid was linked to the 3-position of a Glc residue because of the appearance of 3-O-CD3 derivative.